Diskussion:Wie funktioniert ein Computer?: Unterschied zwischen den Versionen

Aus Mmktagung
Zur Navigation springenZur Suche springen
(Do you know the address? <a href=" http://www.ohword.com/freelance-writing-agency/#crab ">how do i finish my homework fast</a> In a bid to tackle the region's problems, in 1996 the Russian autho)
(It's funny goodluck <a href=" http://www.videogameconsolelibrary.com/blog/?p=law-assignment-help-uk#mud ">essay writing service canada</a> Intended to boost support for clean energy technologies, the)
Zeile 1: Zeile 1:
Thanks funny site <a href=" http://www.ohword.com/customessays/#doer ">liberty university admissions essay examples</a>  All this underscores the sad reality that the U.S. government has grown content with playing whack-a-mole, responding to threats as they pop up. Instead, we need to be playing chess, thinking five moves ahead of our adversaries and investing in the technologies that can counter future missile threats. Only then will the U.S. focus on defenses capable of defeating both the threats of today and of tomorrow. 
+
Thanks funny site <a href=" http://www.ohword.com/customessays/#doer ">liberty university admissions essay examples</a>  All this underscores the sad reality that the U.S. government has grown content with playing whack-a-mole, responding to threats as they pop up. Instead, we need to be playing chess, thinking five moves ahead of our adversaries and investing in the technologies that can counter future missile threats. Only then will the U.S. focus on defenses capable of defeating both the threats of today and of tomorrow. 

Version vom 30. Oktober 2014, 07:46 Uhr

Thanks funny site <a href=" http://www.ohword.com/customessays/#doer ">liberty university admissions essay examples</a> All this underscores the sad reality that the U.S. government has grown content with playing whack-a-mole, responding to threats as they pop up. Instead, we need to be playing chess, thinking five moves ahead of our adversaries and investing in the technologies that can counter future missile threats. Only then will the U.S. focus on defenses capable of defeating both the threats of today and of tomorrow.ÂÂ